Use AI assistance while editing a prompt

Review the proposed change before applying it

Select the passage you want to improve for focused help, or leave the full prompt in focus for a broader review. State the outcome you want: shorten the response style, clarify uncertainty handling or remove a contradiction. Include a harmless example of the failure when it helps.

Inspect the proposal’s current text and replacement. Check whether it changes a business rule, invents a tool or introduces a promise such as an immediate refund. Accept only the part you understand. A polished sentence is not independent evidence that your business can do what it says.

If the text was changed while a proposal was being prepared, review the current passage again. Avoid applying a replacement to a different selection merely because the wording looks similar. Use the editor’s selection controls to check the intended location.

Examples of useful requests

Ask for a specific improvement and define what must stay true. Review all suggested text against the actual agent configuration.

• “Rewrite this section to admit missing dimensions and ask which variant the visitor means. Do not invent a size.”
• “Remove duplicate style rules while keeping the requirement to answer in the visitor’s language.”
• “Find contradictions between these handoff rules. Do not add new tools or support promises.”
• “Make this instruction easier to test and suggest three boundary scenarios.”

A proposal, a test and a saved agent are different states

Applying a proposal updates the editing draft. Test draft evaluates a snapshot. The agent’s save action persists reviewed settings. Keep these steps distinct and check the visible save feedback before leaving the page.

If the suggestion improves style but weakens factual accuracy, reject that tradeoff. Compare the same regression scenarios and inspect sources rather than judging the change only by how natural the response sounds.